4 ms·
I think it's useful. I just think that it's comparably less useful than doing it in a way that costs less energy like in Nano's (and others) case.
by Tenoke 6y ago
I think it's useful. I just think that it's comparably less useful than doing it in a way that costs less energy like in Nano's (and others) case.
- capableweb 6y agoSo you think the drawbacks of Nano are not impacting it's usefulness compared to Bitcoin? Last time I checked, Nano didn't have any trustless lightweight wallets, you can't attach any data to transactions and also no multisig.