2 ms·
Overall I agree with you, but what bothers me is that people continue to say that PoW is waste of energy, even if the article is about moving 38M USD for 0.0064
by capableweb 6y ago
Overall I agree with you, but what bothers me is that people continue to say that PoW is waste of energy, even if the article is about moving 38M USD for 0.0064 USD. How does that make sense if it's actually doing something useful? Or you think in general moving money around is not useful?
- Tenoke 6y agoI think it's useful. I just think that it's comparably less useful than doing it in a way that costs less energy like in Nano's (and others) case.
- capableweb 6y agoSo you think the drawbacks of Nano are not impacting it's usefulness compared to Bitcoin? Last time I checked, Nano didn't have any trustless lightweight wallets, you can't attach any data to transactions and also no multisig.