I don’t think it’s unfair to call it a drop in replacement, though the current limitations should perhaps be caveated a little more clearly. I think calling it

I don’t think it’s unfair to call it a drop in replacement, though the current limitations should perhaps be caveated a little more clearly. I think calling it a drop in replacement highlights that the aim of Zluda is to not require recompilation of the software being run. Maybe “Proof of concept drop in replacement” would be a better description?