3 ms·
At what point do you allow for any risk management whatsoever? Your arguments against risk management rely on an an event space being large enough such that att
by bordercases 6y ago
At what point do you allow for any risk management whatsoever? Your arguments against risk management rely on an an event space being large enough such that attempting to prepare for at least some events is absurd. That's the charitable version anyhow since I'm assuming that you actually do want to do risk management, which you discounted out of hand at the beginning just because there are many risks.
Any heuristic to make this more tractable (including ones that eschew having to work with probabilities and thus event space sizes, like the consequence-based approach) works in favor of more prep.
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoI said that you can't mitigate every possible disaster. It is a logical fallacy to conclude that I meant "do no risk management whatsoever"; that does not at all follow from what I said.