3 ms·
I don't disagree with you, but I think parent's point still stands that "user hostile content" is defined by a company that could change their definition at any
by doakes 6y ago
I don't disagree with you, but I think parent's point still stands that "user hostile content" is defined by a company that could change their definition at any time.
- solosoyokaze 6y agoA truly user friendly solution would be to allow community curation of blocklists and full user control over which they choose to enable. Google is not interested in providing a good user experience though, they're interested in sucking out as much value from the user as possible, using dark patterns when convenient. With that, I also agree that Google couldn't be trusted to editorialize.
- a1369209993 6y agoNo. "User hostile content" is defined by the user.