3 ms·
> If you want to identify an anonymous counter, or keep depersonalised logs, or IP logs for security, that's fine; it can't identify the user. (Maybe IP logs c
by ggggtez 6y ago
> If you want to identify an anonymous counter, or keep depersonalised logs, or IP logs for security, that's fine; it can't identify the user. (Maybe IP logs could)
Some laypeople would disagree.
That's what it means to be "nebulous". A term like "tracking" needs to be defined in technical/legal language. You can't simply ask a random sample of the entire world's population and expect to get a consistent answer about what should be allowed and what should not.
- TheCoelacanth 6y agoThere is no such need. Plenty of laws are based on what a "reasonable person"[1] would believe rather than based on an objective standard. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_person https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_person
- afiori 6y agothe gdpr managed to do that. the solution is to focus on user experience and privacy not technical details as counters or ip addresses