3 ms·
It's logistics, and also RSA to their eternal discredit did not recommend or pay for replacement. Those aren't cheap (like $50 apiece). If you're a CTO with 10
by RockyMcNuts 15y ago
It's logistics, and also RSA to their eternal discredit did not recommend or pay for replacement. Those aren't cheap (like $50 apiece). If you're a CTO with 1000 users and rudimentary security knowledge, are you going to spend $50,000 and a bunch of time tracking down every single user (who will think it's all a terrible bore) and replace their token, if the company you rely on to keep you secure doesn't say it's necessary? I give credit to the people who didn't screw around, and switched vendors.
- trotsky 15y agoRSA to their eternal discredit did not recommend replacement Is that just your assumption? I believe everyone who received guidance from RSA on the subject was asked to sign a non-disclosure, but I think some of them might be surprised to hear you say that.
- RockyMcNuts 15y agoas a small client and in touch with other small clients, no, very definitely NOT just an assumption.
- trotsky 15y agoSounds like they didn't have enough in the supply chain in the short run and picked and choosed. ouch.