Who's suggesting we be 100% prepared for all contingencies? At a high level, there's a tension between efficiency and resiliency. Profit growth necessarily dem

Who's suggesting we be 100% prepared for all contingencies? At a high level, there's a tension between efficiency and resiliency. Profit growth necessarily demands an increase in efficiency, and resiliency necessarily drops. Texas's power grid is a recent good example of this issue. Texas chose to skip many resiliency measures w/r/t cold temperatures even though they suffered this same issue 10 years ago. The expense, for the businesses, may be lower to rebuild after disasters. But these types of catastrophes often cost people their lives.