3 ms·
I've been following this for a while (~months), unless this a new bill. If it's the same bill, then I see it possibly propelling us down the road to Shadowrun
by Communitivity 6y ago
I've been following this for a while (~months), unless this a new bill. If it's the same bill, then I see it possibly propelling us down the road to Shadowrun style corporations with extra-territoriality.
What I'd like to see implemented is a city government formed as a Distributed Autonomous Organization (DAO) into which city taxes went, and for which the owners are the inhabitants of the city. The security would need to be set up much better than the DAO corporation was for this to work though.
There are a lot of thorny issues to be resolved beside security too. For example, if you make owners be the taxpayers, you excluding population segments (many students, those earning less than the poverty line, etc.). If instead you have ownership be based on mandatory buy in when people move to the city, that creates other problems, including two classes of citizenship within the city (owners and not-owners).
I still think a DAC (Distributed Autonomous Community) is viable and possibly a good idea though. I just don't want to see it under a Board of Directors control, or individual control. Because.. "You know that road. You know exactly where it ends. And I know that's not where you want to be."
- 4b11b4 6y agoHave you come across any DACs or close?
- Communitivity 6y agoNot yet, it would be a new thing. The DAC name itself is something I made up.