4 ms·
For such a long blog, I still didn't understand how does one read more effeciently, or did I miss something? Or is it just a clickbait title, since the majorit
by newbie578 6y ago
For such a long blog, I still didn't understand how does one read more effeciently, or did I miss something?
Or is it just a clickbait title, since the majority of the blog just defends reading and counts it's pros.
- C4stor 6y agoTL;DR : Start taking notes about what you read if you want to actually remember a bit of it. Here you go.
- BeetleB 6y agoWhile correct, this won't be enough. I've been doing that for years and doing it well is fairly challenging.
- aftabh 6y agoI highly recommend that you consult the original book (also referenced in TFA) as your primary source to find answer to your question. > Let it be understood at once that we are wholly in favour of the proposition that most people ought to be able to read faster than they do. Too often, there are things we have to read that are not really worth spending a lot of time reading; if we cannot read them quickly, it will be a terrible waste of time. It is true enough that many people read some things too slowly, and that they ought to read them faster. But many people also read some things too fast, and they ought to read those things more slowly. A good speed reading course should therefore teach you to read at many different speeds, not just one speed that is faster than anything you can manage now. It should enable you to vary your rate of reading in accordance with the nature and complexity of the material. > Excerpt From: Mortimer J. Adler. “How to Read a Book.”
- ohduran 6y agoAgreed. Go straight to the source: How to read a book, by Mortimer Adler. Ironically you will find there that you must grapple with the good books, which arguably disqualifies just reading about it in a blog.
- BeetleB 6y agoIt's a good book, but it's as information "sparse" as the post. It could be reduced to a fifth of its size.