4 ms·
Your link [1] is actually the answer to/against moxie by Daniel Gultsch. Please be fair and first give the original article so people can make up their own mind
by m4lvin 6y ago
Your link [1] is actually the answer to/against moxie by Daniel Gultsch. Please be fair and first give the original article so people can make up their own mind:
https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/ https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/
There is also a live talk by Moxie at 36C3: https://app.media.ccc.de/v/36c3-11086-the_ecosystem_is_moving https://app.media.ccc.de/v/36c3-11086-the_ecosystem_is_movin...
- ezst 6y ago> Your link [1] is actually the answer to/against moxie by Daniel Gultsch. True, I meant to move the reference at the end of the sentence rather than linking the two as initially planned, ended-up doing half of that. > There is also a live talk by Moxie at 36C3 IIRC, that's the one he didn't like to be ridiculed over and asked the organizers to take down.
- ergl 6y ago> that's the one he didn't like to be ridiculed over and asked the organizers to take down. This is repeated every single time, when the reality is that Moxie asked the organizers _in advance_ not to record the talk[0]: > I just prefer to present something as part of a conversation that’s happening in a place, rather than a webinar that I’m broadcasting forever to the world. I have less faith in the internet as a place where a conversation can happen, and the timelessness of it decontextualizes. [0]: https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1211427007596154881 https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1211427007596154881