14 ms·
The reason that the UK is poor is because it a) lacks the natural resources of the US (including land). 66M people live in the UK, but 60M of them live in Engla
by sgt101 6y ago
The reason that the UK is poor is because it a) lacks the natural resources of the US (including land). 66M people live in the UK, but 60M of them live in England, meaning that England has 428 people kM^2 - California is 250 or so, the USA overall is 92.
but also b) which is that after the second world war there was a long period of under-capitalization for all elements of the economy apart from defence (arguably). Like the rest of Europe the UK was broke and devastated after WW2 - both in terms of fiscal and human capital. Unlike the rest of Western Europe the UK used its (very generous, TY USA!) Marshall payments to maintain it's navy during the collapse of the British Empire. You could pretend that this was something that kept order during the imperial fall... but the reality was that it was largely a vanity project by a British state that hadn't come to terms with the world as it was or would be.
This meant that the UK's infrastructure and industry were much weaker than the rest of Europe's for the period from 1955->1985 or so, and the UK's poor fiscal position was compounded by its lack of competitiveness. This was changed by North Sea oil which created a substantial recapitalization and brought the UK back into something approaching competitiveness.
- Quarrelsome 6y agoYou big up the generous Marshall plan without even registering it was the Anglo-American loan agreement that ripped the wheels off the British economy following the war. The US had a choice at that point about whether it wanted to keep the British Empire alive and it chose not to, only the insight of the Marshall plan prevented it from sliding entirely into ruin but its effectively the "same" hand behind both acts and I believe any "thanks" is diplomatic drivel for the sake of a world of US hegemony. > a British state that hadn't come to terms with the world as it was or would be. Brexit demonstrates this still isn't the case among the boomers who were brought up on post-war culture that celebrated the victories and "glory" of war which avoiding the ugly non-PG-13 parts that provide the much needed context of those pyrrhic victories.
- readflaggedcomm 6y agoPolitical union doesn't eliminate war, especially when it exacerbates economic tensions which create conflict.