> The model authors have since argued that the data was correct, but people responded to the pandemic by changing the way we live. That's OP point: that feedbac

> The model authors have since argued that the data was correct, but people responded to the pandemic by changing the way we live. That's OP point: that feedback cycles and corrections exist and they make modeling dynamic systems very difficult. Were they actually so naïve that their model did not allow for the possibility that human beings change their behavior in fear of death by pandemic?