2 ms·
There's some precedent both ways: You can't be forced: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html You
by getsat 15y ago
There's some precedent both ways:
You can't be forced: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html
You can be forced: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Boucher http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Boucher
Though, in the latter case he had previously given access to his system.
- eli 15y agoAnd the prior took place at the border, where the Bill of Rights inexplicably does not always apply.
- getsat 15y agoYup, it's the Constitution-free Zone. http://www.aclu.org/national-security_technology-and-liberty/are-you-living-constitution-free-zone http://www.aclu.org/national-security_technology-and-liberty... The authors of the Federalist Papers were against a specific enumeration of individual rights because they feared that those rights would become the only ones we had. They were prescient in some ways, but I doubt any of them foresaw the entire Constitution being suspended.