2 ms·
Demanding 100% encryption also locks out some retrocomputing hardware that had existing browsers in the early Internet days. Not all sites need encryption. Wher
by LocalH 6y ago
Demanding 100% encryption also locks out some retrocomputing hardware that had existing browsers in the early Internet days. Not all sites need encryption. Where it's appropriate, most certainly. HTTPS should be the overwhelming standard. But there is a place for HTTP, and there should always be. Same for other unencrypted protocols. Unencrypted FTP still has a place.
- SahAssar 6y agoHTTP/FTP certainly have their place, but that is not on the open internet. For retro computing and otherwise special cases a proxy on the local network can do HTTP->HTTPS conversion.
- Wowfunhappy 6y agoIt's unfortunate that there doesn't seem to be a turn-key solution for this at the moment. I'm currently using Squid so I can use web-enabled applications on an older version of OS X, and it's great, but figuring out how to set it up took a solid day of work (partly because their documentation isn't very good), and the result will only work on macOS. Mitmproxy is much easier to set up, but too heavy for 24/7 use. Ideally this would be a DDWRT package, or maybe a Raspberry Pi image, all preconfigured and ready to go...
- LocalH 6y ago>HTTP/FTP certainly have their place, but that is not on the open internet. Then it ceases to be the "open" internet.
- MayeulC 6y agoYou can always uses a MITM proxy that presents an unencrypted view of the web. As long as you keep to HTML+CSS, that should be enough. Some simple js also, but you can't generate https URLs on the client side. Which, for retrocomputing, is probably fine. You wouldn't want to expose these "retro" machines to the Internet anyways.