4 ms·
I'm sure their own documentation is good, but certainly early on the tutorials always seemed to be a mess. Lots of similar articles written by different people
by tweetle_beetle 6y ago
I'm sure their own documentation is good, but certainly early on the tutorials always seemed to be a mess. Lots of similar articles written by different people with different structures and advice, without referencing other related tutorials. There seemed to be very little in the way of editorial control, but maybe that's better now. It was a good, cheap content strategy for SEO, but not a genuinely good resource.
- vinger 6y agoHaving 5 people install slightly different varations of a stack provided so much value it was and still is the best resource when installing a new stack.
- dumbsecreport 6y agoThats because a lot of it was lifted directly from the web. They paid people a stupid price per article to either write articles or copy paste documentation online while barely vetting it, only taking it down when people took the time to send in reports to staff. I'm sure things have improved since then.