3 ms·
It's about the process, which is roughly "find property X that produces the maximum separation between the groups we care about but would arouse the least susp
by cozzyd 6y ago
It's about the process, which is roughly
"find property X that produces the maximum separation between the groups we care about but would arouse the least suspicion"
and then making X a requirement.
- throwaway0a5e 6y ago"You must be X rich to vote" seems like the low hanging fruit.
- upbeat_general 6y agoExcept that arouses too much suspicion. Though in fairness that is what used to be the divider.
- throwaway0a5e 6y ago"Must be a net tax payer" is the modern equivalent that gets thrown around. Obviously nobody on the left throws the idea around but I can't help but wonder if it would actually help them considering how many 16yos have jobs but are net tax payers because they have no dependents.
- cozzyd 6y agoIf people reporting business losses in any given year couldn't vote... I'm not so sure I'd be opposed!