3 ms·
I have nothing neither against LastPass, nor for Dracula, and I've never used either so I might be wrong, but here are a few differences that IMO matter a lot:
by jk7tarYZAQNpTQa 6y ago
I have nothing neither against LastPass, nor for Dracula, and I've never used either so I might be wrong, but here are a few differences that IMO matter a lot:
- Dracula is FOSS. LastPass has some FOSS projects, but the key ones aren't.
- Dracula is a one-time-purchase, LastPass follows the terrible trend where everything must be subscription based.
- You can use Dracula when the server is down. You can't use LastPass when the server is down. Yes, you can manually backup the vault somewhere, but (a) there's AFAIK no way to automate it, and (b) you should be updating the backup every time you edit the database, which turns into a PITA.
As a customer I really dislike LastPass' business model. I rather use KeePass, and pay a hundred bucks for some Vim rice.
- Sebb767 6y ago> - Dracula is a one-time-purchase, LastPass follows the terrible trend where everything must be subscription based. Let's be fair here: LastPass needs to finance storage servers, network infrastructure, security engineers etc.. Dracula needs a CDN for downloads. Of course this is a bit simplified (the author needs the editors and a payment processer, for example), but it's a lot easier to work with a one-time fee when nearly all of your cost is up front and you have basically no running costs.