3 ms·
Yeah, I'm aware, that this is probably not the most effective way. I'm mainly curious and now I've an opportunity to try it. Chances are, that I return to clas
by emaro 6y ago
Yeah, I'm aware, that this is probably not the most effective way. I'm mainly curious and now I've an opportunity to try it.
Chances are, that I return to classic graphical video editing if it doesn't work. I think an instruction video could be possible to 'code', because you can build it with basic shapes, animations and text--if you want to explain something, you need to keep it simple anyway.
- brudgers 6y agoThere’s ffmpeg. It’s scriptable, mature and robust. I think KdenLive generates scripts and then renders from them. Most programming language support for video editing is a wrapper around it.
- CinematicStudio 6y agoI agree you need to keep it simple, for sure. But if you don't have a WhatYouSeeIsWhatYouGet editor, you'll need to regenerate your video countless times until you get it right. That's the only issue I have with it - but clearly, if you wanna do it like this, suit yourself :D As a side note, I'm working on a video editor, and what I'm working on now, is the ability to add shapes (amongst other things :D) and have an insanely easy way to animate them.