4 ms·
Not really mind blowing, they will use the same setup as dropbox i presume; storing the same file only 'once' instead than on a per-user basis.
by jrnkntl 15y ago
Not really mind blowing, they will use the same setup as dropbox i presume; storing the same file only 'once' instead than on a per-user basis.
- ugh 15y agoThe politics are mind blowing, not the technology. Over the last few days I have read so many comments on HN confidently proclaiming that the music labels would never ever ever do something like this.
- wmf 15y agoThe labels will never do this unless you pay them, which is what Apple just did. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2602817 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2602817
- sudont 15y agoOne wonders if Apple makes any profit on the 24.99, or if it's all to appease the old, angry gods. There's a limit of 25k songs, and Apple doesn't say if the music disappears if contract ends.