3 ms·

I'm not sure there is one but it may be the Dissenter browser, which is a fork of Brave. It is ultimately based on Chromium tech, but we need to stat somewhere.

I'm not sure there is one but it may be the Dissenter browser, which is a fork of Brave. It is ultimately based on Chromium tech, but we need to stat somewhere. The browsers will ultimately end up implementing their own censorship. I was surprised (but also not surprised) when Chrome and Firefox banned the Dissenter comments extension (https://reclaimthenet.org/dissenter-free-speech-browser/ https://reclaimthenet.org/dissenter-free-speech-browser/) and with that ban being normalized, it'll soon come to which IP addresses you can access.

viraptor 6y ago
> extension to help users resist online censorship and integrated ad blocking The irony of this is amazing.
- byecomputer 6y ago
  Does believing in freedom of speech while blocking advertisements make one a hypocrite? If it does, well, I'm going to keep doing it. Happy to be a hypocrite on that count.
  - viraptor 6y ago
    I think both "it'll soon come to which IP addresses you can access." and recommending instead a browser which does pretty much that (just at url level) by default and says it's anti-censorship is hypocrisy, yes. Opting into that filtering - not as much.
    - byecomputer 6y ago
      Maybe, but I'm still pretty confident that no important or meaningful speech will ever come from an ad server.