> Do you think it is fair for a person who owns $2M worth house to still receive benefits paid from taxpayers money? Does this apply to all people who have $2M

> Do you think it is fair for a person who owns $2M worth house to still receive benefits paid from taxpayers money? Does this apply to all people who have $2M regardless of whether it’s invested in a house? > For someone with $2M (or 1.5M, or even 1M) net worth possibilities are endless and living off of taxpayers money shouldn't be one of them. It isn’t one of them.