4 ms·
I'd take cheap/fast/(won't go down 99.99% of the time) vs expensive/slow/can't go down
by partiallypro 6y ago
I'd take cheap/fast/(won't go down 99.99% of the time) vs expensive/slow/can't go down
- capableweb 6y agoThey are not even targeting/hitting 99.99% in availability, see https://www.frbservices.org/resources/financial-services/ach/quality-volume-statistics.html https://www.frbservices.org/resources/financial-services/ach...
- partiallypro 6y agoEven if it's only 99.9% vs 99.99% it's still more efficient.
- xirbeosbwo1234 6y agoCorrection: expensive/slow/is down literally all the time because it can't be used for its intended purpose even if it's theoretically running