3 ms·

It doesn’t seem like this is the correct reason. I feel the recent short had more of an impact: https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lrlmqx/14_mill

It doesn’t seem like this is the correct reason. I feel the recent short had more of an impact: https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lrlmqx/14_million_more_gme_shares_have_been_borrowed/ https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/lrlmqx/14_m...

spelunker 6y ago
Agreed. Lots of people will probably read "amid" == "because".
vmception 6y ago
Okay that’s beautiful Everytime they pass through the gate, they agitate an ancient populist fury
EpicEng 6y ago
Yeah, definitely not because a CFO was ousted. Hit 200 AH and volume is insane.