4 ms·
This is largely a (smart) political move by the opposition right-wing party. Canada is embroiled in a political issue with China right now. They're holding a H
by kareemm 6y ago
This is largely a (smart) political move by the opposition right-wing party.
Canada is embroiled in a political issue with China right now. They're holding a Huawei exec named Meng Wanzhou at the request of the US, who are investigating Huawei for violating sanctions against China[1].
China retaliated by arresting two Canadians without apparent cause[2]. They're been in jail for two years.
The Conservative party put forth this motion for a vote as a move to put Trudeau's Liberal government in an awkward place: they would either condemn China's treatment of the Uighurs and make the Michaels/Meng Wanzhou situation more painful, or they wouldn't and would appear to condone genocide.
FWIW I suspect Trudeau and the Liberal party do believe Uighur treatment to be genocide (I do). But stating it publicly would make life even more difficult for them.
1- https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46462858 https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46462858
2- https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/two-michaels-mark-two-jailed-years-in-china-no-development-in-their-cases-1.5225036 https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/two-michaels-mark-two-jailed-y...
- dleslie 6y agoIt's supported by the NDP, Greens, and Bloc as well. In fact, it was all Yay and Abstains.
- reducesuffering 6y agoNone of those parties are the Cabinet, the face of Canada on the international stage, and the one China is looking at.
- dleslie 6y agoAFAICT from the way that China's diplomats engage with Canada, they don't seem to understand how Canada operates. While the PMO is powerful, it's not able to dictate how the judiciary operates or pass legislation without house/senate approval. OIC notwithstanding, I guess. ;)
- gruez 6y ago>it was all Yay and Abstains. not surprising. Voting nay would be political suicide.