3 ms·
This is all about trying to short circuit attempts at the state level in reforming housing like SB10 and SB478. The first allows skipping of some environmental
by Shivetya 6y ago
This is all about trying to short circuit attempts at the state level in reforming housing like SB10 and SB478. The first allows skipping of some environmental checks but the second goes after cities by limiting how floor area ratio (FAR)regulations are applied; the common tactic is to upzone a property to look like it permits denser housing but set a FAR requirement that completely blocks it.
Sadly for libertarians like me it is going to take state intervention over cities and counties to fix it. Why is that a problem, well I would prefer the cities and counties to fix it themselves as local governance should be able to do that.
However the real culprit is the entire process has been hijacked by special interest groups along all lines who want their piece of the pie or simply don't want anyone else to have a share of the pie. So through the elected officials by whom they control through contributions and media to the courts when all else fails it is very difficult to get anything actually done.
- bobthepanda 6y agoThe reason why state control works better in this scenario is because of the law of numbers. It takes a lot more effort to exert control over a state than a city, town, or county. Add in the fact that voter interest and participation drops at each lower level of government, and you have a recipe for capture. School boards are probably the best example of this. This is a big problem in NYS, where there are too many little overlapping fiefdoms with different boundaries, election schedules, etc. that your average citizen cannot be expected to keep track of and hold accountable; basically government by obfuscation. Robert Moses did a lot of bad things, but he did towards the end of his career call for things to be consolidated at a level no lower than county level.