Thanks for the link. It's absurd when any party imposes political-correctness social engineering policies on companies about who can participate on their board

Thanks for the link. It's absurd when any party imposes political-correctness social engineering policies on companies about who can participate on their boards. It may sound and feel "good" or "progress" to implementors, but it merely continues racial and gender discrimination in different forms, doesn't heal society, and is ultimately intellectually dishonest. It's curious how often racism "doesn't exist" when it primarily harms white or Asian (unless it's about Asianness) people and sexism "doesn't exist" regarding straight cis men, and anyone in these groups who mentions it is a different form of unfairness are "racist," "bitching," "entitled," or "not checking their privilege." Can't we get to the point where we're friends and calling each other ethnic slurs jokingly-ironically (this was a case internally at a UK startup in Victoria, and the vibe with all sorts of people in our motley crew was family. It was unintentional, unplanned diversity because we hired the best.)?