> If you can take these tools and show that any of the truths presented in this article are false This is not the opposite of taking those as axiomatic truths.

> If you can take these tools and show that any of the truths presented in this article are false This is not the opposite of taking those as axiomatic truths. You're also calling them truths and saying it's on me (as a novice) to show them false? This only proves my point that they are not properly examined. Like I said, it bothers me.