4 ms·
If there are significant errors, fix them yourself. There's no need to go to the discussion page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD http://en.wikiped
by xxpor 15y ago
If there are significant errors, fix them yourself. There's no need to go to the discussion page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD
- CJefferson 15y agoExcept I find most of my changes get reverted, even if referenced or simply deleting incorrect and unreferenced information. I don't have time to enter a life-long battle keeping an article correct.
- TikiTDO 15y agoSomething does not compute there. If your changes are getting reverted, obviously someone cares enough to notice, so it follows that they should care enough to check the discussion. Are you sure you're not just getting hit by a bot? Maybe you did not tag your changes properly? If anything, there might be a problem that the admins should look at. I would like to see some of these changes you are talking about.
- woodall 15y agoMy experience with Wikipedia has been hit or miss. Sometimes I'll find an older article and fix it up a bit and it will stay. Other times I get my edit reverted by an over zealous neck beard who can't handle being wrong on the internet. I don't have the time to battle these types of people. This is what sunk, "Wikipedia is not a creditable source" into my brain.
- wbhart 15y agoQuoting from that page: "Don't get upset if your bold edits get deleted." Which is my experience entirely. Sorry, but being bold is a great way to waste my time, not to actually get things fixed.