3 ms·

Yup, it's on writing more, not on writing something useful. They chose quantity over quality. For what it's worth, it's long and rambling. The abject incoher

Yup, it's on writing more, not on writing something useful. They chose quantity over quality. For what it's worth, it's long and rambling. The abject incoherence of their writing fails to hold your attention. > I needed write about it ... > you’ll run out of things write about ... > I take that as a sign that to not hold anything back. > in the guise of letting you knowing me better The article is riddled with various typos. Let me refer to this HN commentary: Most of What We Read on the Internet is Written by Insane People https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18881827 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18881827

jrh206 6y ago
There's a human on the other end of this who has put a lot of time into creating this article. For what it's worth, I agree with you. But I think this criticism could have been phrased more constructively. For instance, 'Most of What You Read on the Internet is Written by Insane People' is a perfectly fine article in isolation, but to bring it up in direct response to an article is tantamount to calling the author insane.
rrrrrrrrrrrryan 6y ago
Out of curiosity, did you copy and paste this article into some grammer-checker to identify these typos? I didn't spot any of these during my (admittedly quick) initial read, and having something like this would be helpful for my own writing.