3 ms·
Yes, it's something that's already done at intervals. The implication is that maybe that interval is too long. Also from TFA: Based on the initial results as w
by throwawayboise 6y ago
Yes, it's something that's already done at intervals. The implication is that maybe that interval is too long. Also from TFA:
Based on the initial results as we receive them, as well as other data gained from the ongoing investigation, the FAA may revise this directive to set a new interval for this inspection or subsequent ones.
- fennecfoxen 6y agoThere's also the possibility that the usual inspection shop was doing a bad job of applying its standards with the necessary consistency and rigor, and that new inspections after engine explosions might see them paying more attention. See this interesting article on the specifics of the P&W fan blade inspection shop and the process, which the NTSB previously concluded in summer 2020 has hidden behind the label "new and emerging technology" for far too long, avoiding the scrutiny which might make it more reliable: http://aerossurance.com/safety-management/ndi-failures-b777-pw4077-fbo/ http://aerossurance.com/safety-management/ndi-failures-b777-...
- TylerE 6y agoPossible, but less likely since this has now happened 3 times, on different (but otherwise basically identical planes) in an ~18 month time span
- pdonis 6y ago> this has now happened 3 times, on different (but otherwise basically identical planes) in an ~18 month time span Wouldn't that make it more likely that there is some systemic cause, such as a flawed inspection process?