3 ms·
While some elements of new UI definitely require improvements to OS underpinnings (e.g. the idea of adding gradient blurs everywhere), the vast majority do not.
by makecheck 6y ago
While some elements of new UI definitely require improvements to OS underpinnings (e.g. the idea of adding gradient blurs everywhere), the vast majority do not.
Why can’t we have OSes layered better so that the “core” can evolve but these “design”-of-the-week changes can remain compartmentalized and potentially ignored from one release to the next?
To a large extent, nothing ought to break if you simply allow users to choose from any of the “looks and feels” of the past few years while updating the lower-level OS to be the latest. It also means you could have different security policies, e.g. prefer to auto-update more at the lower layers and auto-update less or never at the GUI scale.
And, any “correct” application is somewhat layout-agnostic anyway: technically with various Accessibility settings you can already change the look and feel and behavior a lot, and apps will not work quite right if they don’t respect these settings. There is not much difference between those changes and any Apple “design” from one year to the next.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- Wowfunhappy 6y agoI'd like the underpinnings to stop changing so much too! I want my OS to be (1) stable, and (2) performant, and macOS has gone backwards on both counts. The M1 is speedy for sure, but that's hardware. I just want Apple to stop making changes. Microsoft too. Push security updates, fix bugs, and back off. We've been making desktop OS's for 30 years, and we've pretty much figured them out at this point. There's no reason to switch things out from under me every 12 months, all it seems to do is make everything less stable.