4 ms·

What is your conclusion here/what are you saying. Are you claiming this could be extraterrestrial?

• vulcan01 6y ago
  Not the OP, but sometimes I wonder whether some of these events are effects of testing by foreign militaries, and the DoD wants to hide knowledge of foreign military technology (because maybe they're trying to copy it).
  • themodelplumber 6y ago
    Interesting but it raises some questions that get really weird fast: A) The contents of these experiences tend to swing toward "random and subjective, but in a funny, objective way" which would eventually, logically lead to the conclusion that e.g. mind control is directly available and usable--so why not use it like a government would? B) Which experiences fall within this scope? Which do not? How could you start to identify them and develop an idea as to purpose? And C) in the event of any disclosure from moles or leaks inside _any_ military that's involved, I would expect it to hit the fan very fast, on any side you can name. The details are going to be key, and there are way too many hand-wave explanations that involve broad gestures toward "government stuff".
• themodelplumber 6y ago
  My point is that A) coming to a conclusion as to what the object is may be way too early, and B) the coverup that urgently needs to be exploded and brought to a conclusion ASAP is the "don't look into things" approach to things we don't already know about. Again: I personally have no opinion on this, as to weapon or sky dolphins or aliens.