3 ms·
You're where I am and I've had this Intel MBP for nearly 4 years and haven't been nice to it (compiling, etc). Percentage Used: 3% D
by boardwaalk 6y ago
You're where I am and I've had this Intel MBP for nearly 4 years and haven't been nice to it (compiling, etc).
Percentage Used: 3%
Data Units Read: 57,377,073 [29.3 TB]
Data Units Written: 77,652,525 [39.7 TB]
Host Read Commands: 1,297,472,434
Host Write Commands: 1,855,797,459
I have 10x your host r/w commands. I wonder if the size of the SSD's blocks on these new MBP are very large so you get large physical writes for small OS writes? Or maybe the controller is bad at coalescing writes?
- tyingq 6y ago~10x off could also just be bad math in the smartdata path somewhere, either on the drive, or in the OS.
- pcnix 6y agoIntel MBP at two years ``` === START OF SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02) Critical Warning: 0x00 Temperature: 42 Celsius Available Spare: 100% Available Spare Threshold: 99% Percentage Used: 23% Data Units Read: 439,149,863 [224 TB] Data Units Written: 407,143,345 [208 TB] Host Read Commands: 2,930,228,690 Host Write Commands: 1,777,317,283 Controller Busy Time: 0 Power Cycles: 103 Power On Hours: 1,691 Unsafe Shutdowns: 49 Media and Data Integrity Errors: 0 Error Information Log Entries: 0 ``` Ouch.