3 ms·
It's certainly an imperfect metric, but I'm skeptical of the claims that there's a better measure for 'higher learning'. Often when people say this, I've found
by fossuser 6y ago
It's certainly an imperfect metric, but I'm skeptical of the claims that there's a better measure for 'higher learning'.
Often when people say this, I've found they're really just using it as a proxy for status or prestige rather than education or critical thinking.
I agree with it in the abstract, but disagree with its use in practice.
- colechristensen 6y agoWho says you have to measure it at all? A valuation based on immediate financial value turns universities into trade schools (which to be fair, more people need / are really looking for). And also it would turn universities in to not-very-good trade schools. Why would they train school teachers or social workers when they make so little money? Metrics change what they observe, unless you are extremely careful, usually for the worse.