it seems the definition for "reply-guy" is quite broad and could include anything from an "unwanted opinion" by a person with the "wrong" ideology in their own

it seems the definition for "reply-guy" is quite broad and could include anything from an "unwanted opinion" by a person with the "wrong" ideology in their own profile, to ad-hominem attacks. the right part of the quote of what she dealt with is IMO relevant and should be quoted in full to keep the message intact (for anyone who hasn't read the actual article): > "Everything from the casual mansplaining-reply guys to really targeted, persistent harassment and stalking and explicit threats that have led me to have to go to the police and file reports." reply-guy is IMO (in its weakest form) a product of the twitter algorithm that divides and makes people try to interact in hope of getting seen. But it's the whole range she talks about.