3 ms·
I grepped the article and I don't see anything that could be interpreted as such. Here is the single instance of the word "white": > As she sees it, it's becau
by jakelazaroff 6y ago
I grepped the article and I don't see anything that could be interpreted as such. Here is the single instance of the word "white":
> As she sees it, it's because the predominately white men who start, run and invest in most big tech companies are less likely to personally experience harassment.
And here's the single other instance of the word "men":
> As she sees it, it's because the predominately white men who start, run and invest in most big tech companies are less likely to personally experience harassment.
Basically every other mention of gender or race is some variant of "women and people of color are particularly targeted for online abuse". What are you reading as "attacks on people based on their gender and skin color"?
- adjkant 6y agoSo does anyone want to you know, respond to a question that literally just is declaring facts about words used in the article, or just silently downvote it because they don't like the "side" the point is coming from?