4 ms·
I am no expert but the title appears to be incorrect. Should it not include Pakistan and Bangladesh since they were part of British India...? Pakistan is not e
by Blackstone4 6y ago
I am no expert but the title appears to be incorrect. Should it not include Pakistan and Bangladesh since they were part of British India...?
Pakistan is not even mentioned in the article....for me this undermines the quality of the work.
- ncmncm 6y agoPakistan and Bangladesh were part of the India that was then exploited. It would be impossible to apportion the debt between the three, which is in any case academic because none of the three get to collect on any of it. How to assess the debt for the millions very deliberately starved, as recently as by direct choice of Winston Churchill, would be hard to imagine.
- Blackstone4 6y agoYes the calculation is hard but they ought to still be recognised