3 ms·
"Qualify it as such in the original post." It is unfortunate that people seem not to be able to distinguish between a neutral fact and an endorsement. Just rec
by pacman2 6y ago
"Qualify it as such in the original post."
It is unfortunate that people seem not to be able to distinguish between a neutral fact and an endorsement. Just recently I posted something I consider a fact and since I was afraid if could be controversial, added that this is not meant in a judgmental way. The bulletin board owner took this to a meta level and argued that it was exactly this add-on that showed that it was meant in a judgmental way and banned me.
- yTh0 6y agoIt’s been shown that words mean different things given geographical region. One brain is not composed of the same experiential model, and as a result, neurological model, as others. Physics > chemistry -> biology -> humans -> metaphor and analogy. Kind of my mental road map for information hierarchy. If it’s not physically quantifiable it probably falls into some category like “relative metaphor and analogy”.