3 ms·
This is disinformation. https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/02/01/civil-war-during-trumps-pre-riot-speech-parler-talk-grew-darker/4297165001/ https://w
by setpatchaddress 6y ago
This is disinformation.
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/02/01/civil-war-during-trumps-pre-riot-speech-parler-talk-grew-darker/4297165001/ https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/02/01/civil-war-...
https://nypost.com/2021/01/16/aoc-slams-facebooks-mark-zuckerberg-for-capitol-riot/ https://nypost.com/2021/01/16/aoc-slams-facebooks-mark-zucke...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-blocks-qanon-accounts-capitol-riots/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-blocks-qanon-accounts-c...
- hpcjoe 6y agoNo, it really wasn't dis/mis information. You can't just label facts you don't like, that go against a narrative that you wish to be true, as disinformation. Twitter, Facebook, and many others do this. They specifically stifle discussion that runs counter to the narratives they wish to promote. That's their choice as private companies. But holding them to account for this, when they claim they wish to be "fair" definitely begs the question of what their definition of "fair" is. It makes for a rather Clintonian discussion.