Depending on how you define student, everybody who ever took a linguistics class is a student of Chomsky. But you raise a good point about objectivity. So who

Depending on how you define student, everybody who ever took a linguistics class is a student of Chomsky. But you raise a good point about objectivity. So who/where are the disinterested supporters of Everett's work? What do they believe that the Chomskians are getting wrong about Everett's work? The key word in my query here is disinterested, because almost all criticism of Chomsky is (implicitly or explicitly) based on his political views, rather than his linguistic scholarship.