3 ms·
I think rare in the sense that few can afford to have it.
by pb7 6y ago
I think rare in the sense that few can afford to have it.
- nitrogen 6y agoPart of the problem is that those who don't appreciate it will see how nice a quiet town in the country is, then move from the big city to that town and destroy the very thing they originally enjoyed. Or bring a bluetooth boombox into the wilderness and play it so it can be heard for a mile away.
- vbezhenar 6y agoI'm sure that every country have tiny villages with cheap land. Buy enough land, build a house in the center, grow some trees around and you'll have peaceful house. Of course there are other issues with that lifestyle which is why it's not adopted widely, like no work, issues for children, issues with healthcare, but for some people it could work, IMO.
- pb7 6y ago> no work, issues for children, issues with healthcare There's the rub, no? You need to have a lot of money saved up to not have to work which makes it a luxury. For most people, they need to live near work, which is mostly in or near dense noisy cities.
- burntoutfire 6y agoI'm basically FI and could do that, but the problem is I'd be leaving everyone I know to live alone in a middle of nowhere. Granted, a pretty and picteresque middle of nowhere, but still, it sounds like a recipe for misery. That's why I endure living in a loud and smoggy city...