3 ms·
They aren't disrupting traffic, they are traffic.
by mattbk1 6y ago
They aren't disrupting traffic, they are traffic.
- rank0 6y agoSure. Just like how a reckless driver is traffic too. Doesn't mean cyclists or the reckless drivers are automatically justified.
- mattbk1 6y agoI'm not even sure how to respond to this type of lumping. > Good drivers and reckless drivers are both traffic. Doesn't mean they are both automatically justified.
- rank0 6y agoYour original point seems to be: "bicyclists are not disrupting traffic because they are part of traffic" My counter point is that "being part of traffic does not preclude you from disrupting traffic. See reckless driver example." Did I misunderstand your original comment?
- mattbk1 6y agoIt seems like you got it. I'm trying to parse how you choose to blame people on bicycles for disrupting traffic but not people in cars.