3 ms·
2 parts of this are interesting to me. The first is "House Democrats demand" - the government should not be regulating speech, even if it's false/dangerous/mor
by curiousllama 6y ago
2 parts of this are interesting to me.
The first is "House Democrats demand" - the government should not be regulating speech, even if it's false/dangerous/moronic. The letter is dumb and dangerous.
The second is "Cable providers to censor misinformation" - infrastructure providers regulating speech sounds very similar to the whole Parler deplatforming. I wonder what my own reaction would be if cable companies independently kicked off (say) OANN after the Jan 6 riot. Is the private-to-private speech regulation ok?