3 ms·
> > "Do you have some references?" > > Here's one of many if you google. https://natural-fertility-info.com/study-wi-fi-laptop-computers-decrease-sperm-motili
by gspr 6y ago
> > "Do you have some references?"
>
> Here's one of many if you google. https://natural-fertility-info.com/study-wi-fi-laptop-computers-decrease-sperm-motility-increase-sperm-dna-fragmentation.html https://natural-fertility-info.com/study-wi-fi-laptop-comput...
A blog post by "Dalene Barton - Certified Herbalist, Birth Doula". Lol, you've got to be kidding me?!
> You quoted me in the above and complained about speculation. You can see in the italics that I acknowledge that I don't know if the distant transmitters cause problems or not.
So why bring them up? Moreover: You also don't know if the close ones do. I mean, your herbalist does, but that doesn't count ;-)
> I've already linked one study.
"Study". Something peer-reviewed, please. It can be done by a herbalist if you insist, but it needs to be peer-reviewed by actual experts.
> I'd also like to ask where your evidence is that it is harmless?
That no harm has been found. The same class of evidence you rely on when you eat a carrot and wonder whether it's poisonous or not.
> Did you also miss the study that said specific brain cancer incidence is raised by holding a cell phone to your head?
Glanced at it now. Please correct tme if I'm wrong, but is it really true that that they did a study with n=90 rats and used the occurrance of 2 cases of tumors in them, versus 0 in the control, as evidence???
- giantg2 6y ago"A blog post by "Dalene Barton - Certified Herbalist, Birth Doula". Lol, you've got to be kidding me?!" I'm not citing the blog. The blog merely explains the results of the study. It is a peer reviewed study available through Elseiver. "That no harm has been found. The same class of evidence you rely on when you eat a carrot and wonder whether it's poisonous or not." Let's see your peer reviewed articles that prove it - that was the standard for evidence that you set in your comment. "Glanced at it now. Please correct tme if I'm wrong, but is it really true that that they did a study with n=90 rats and used the occurrance of 2 cases of tumors in them, versus 0 in the control, as evidence???" I gave you one example. Please do some research of your own instead of just trolling. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25738972/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25738972/