4 ms·
This totally reminds me of a recent incident where someone suggested me to file for patents just because I am not getting success with the products/business I a
by uast23 15y ago
This totally reminds me of a recent incident where someone suggested me to file for patents just because I am not getting success with the products/business I am building/trying to build. I did not get the point!
However I have to admit that I find it difficult to totally deny the existence of patents when I think about it from a specific angle such as "stackoverflow vs scrapers". What if stackoverflow had filed for a patent years back!!
EDIT: oh yes I am aware that content protection is a copyright issue and has nothing to do with patent. And thats why I said "thinking from a specific angle"; which means that it is not the exact analogy, it's just a picture how it might happen in the patent ground. And I am not trying to defend SW patents because they do not make sense, I am just bringing up the point that due credit should be given to original author and if he wants to patent it, it should be respected.
- hasenj 15y agoA patent for what? And how useful would it be anyway? The scrappers steal the content, and all the content is user generated.
- uast23 15y ago>content is user generated This is the biggest excuse. Thats how everyone escapes, isn't it? Even funnyjunk does that with oatmeal and claims that it's user generated content http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/06/funnyjunk-vs-the-oatmeal.ars http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/06/funnyjunk-vs...
- burgerbrain 15y agoYou are aware that content ownership is a copyright issue, and has nothing to do with patent law, right?