4 ms·
you're absolutely right - preparing a high quality beef meal takes a lot more than just processing soy, but what I was aiming at was that we will replace one ma
by bkovacev 6y ago
you're absolutely right - preparing a high quality beef meal takes a lot more than just processing soy, but what I was aiming at was that we will replace one mass consumption with the other, just like we always do and that may mask the problem but I believe it won't solve it. I could be wrong though.
- MayeulC 6y agoThe issue is not judt the extra procesding cost. I haven't ran the numbers, but parent hinted at a cow needing to eat, say, 10 Kg of soy per Kg of meat produced, while you could have just eaten the soy directly. Meat production uses a lot of land to produce food for your food, that's why it's so inneficient. Instead you could just use a tiny fraction of that land, and grow enough food for everyone.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- croon 6y ago> but what I was aiming at was that we will replace one mass consumption with the other, just like we always do and that may mask the problem but I believe it won't solve it You're comparing two cases of "mass production" without any quantifier. Beef has an over 15 times larger carbon footprint compared to tofu. https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food So sure, if everyone switches we would substitute one mass production for another, but we could feed 15 times as many people (all else equal).