4 ms·
That kind of statement is fairly routine from people whose world view presupposes godly origin. The unspoken inference is that there must be some objective sour
by sjwright 6y ago
That kind of statement is fairly routine from people whose world view presupposes godly origin. The unspoken inference is that there must be some objective source of mattering. Whereas if we're all just material, we're all just dust and nothing ultimately matters. It's a play on our emotions. It feels like things matter to us, so it seems intuitively wrong that things could ultimately not matter.
But it's just wordplay. Things DO matter to me. I can care about the fate of my descendents many centuries hence; or the fate of human civilisation in a few millennia. So what if human civilisation (or any biological life of Earth origin) might not survive after a billion years and nothing "ultimately" matters?
Besides, the way most human religions try to instantiate this "ultimate mattering" seems fairly horrid to me.