5 ms·
I mean, that's how most people see it. The novel (and extreme) claim here is that things like turn taking and facilitation are white supremacist. You can't just
by skedaddle 6y ago
I mean, that's how most people see it. The novel (and extreme) claim here is that things like turn taking and facilitation are white supremacist. You can't just explain by saying "well in my opinion the KKK used to lynch black girls".
- true_religion 6y agoThe above poster said US culture is "far from being a place where only whites thrive". I was pointing out that a culture where the stoning of children of colour is normalized is not 'thriving' for them. Remember we're talking about history not the present day. As for the article itself, I don't think the idea that Robert's Rules supports white supremacy holds any weight. The author essentially said that it helps those in power as they control the discussion, which is true, and implies that those in power are white supremacists. The later is arguable. I'd say it was most definitely true in the past (Jim Crow laws were wildly popular when first proposed), but not true currently.