Right, Christianity is an outlier in that its prophet is also a supernatural being and also an autonomous part of a single consciousness that is the deity. But

Right, Christianity is an outlier in that its prophet is also a supernatural being and also an autonomous part of a single consciousness that is the deity. But thats not my point. My point is that this article and sources are misinterpreting an old english translation and misinterpeting what Christians do. Its not an argument about whether he was a supernatural deity himself nor about whether the deity is the same entity the Christians worship, its about Christians including non-supernatural prophets in their prohibitions. I think this article (and source book) has mistranslated and extrapolated way to much from that mistranslation.